The UN Human Rights Treaty Bodies: Impact and Future

The United Nations human rights treaty bodies have, from modest beginnings, developed monitoring practices, particularly consideration of States Parties’ reports, individual complaints procedures, and inquiries, which cover a broad range of rights and issues. This development, in particular increasingly participatory procedures, has been lauded as an example of “human rights experimentalism.” The treaty bodies have thereby contributed to the interpretation of international human rights law, though not without some weaknesses, and to the protection of human rights, at least to some extent. While treaty bodies have undoubtedly become an integral part of the UN’s human rights system, they face considerable challenges in terms of their efficiency, effectiveness, and legitimacy. Their proliferation, and the consequent increase in the number of States Parties’ reports and cases, has prompted an ongoing review process. It calls into question the future of the system in its present form and entails that treaty bodies and their record will remain under close scrutiny. Treaty bodies will have to continue navigating conflicting demands and expectations from States Parties, within the United Nations, and civil society organizations. In a world where inequality, conflict, and instability are rife and the very notion of human rights is frequently sidelined if not criticized, treaty bodies face a considerable challenge to ensure effective monitoring and ultimately the protection of human rights. Combining a clear conceptual focus and attention to context with closer institutional alignment and holistic and effective forms of engagement will be critical in meeting this challenge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Similar content being viewed by others

The UN Human Rights Treaty Bodies: Impact and Future

Chapter © 2018

National Human Rights Institutions and the United Nations Human Rights Treaty Body System: A Rebuttal to the Skeptics

Chapter © 2020

Urgency and Human Rights: The Necessary and Legitimate Role of Regional Human Rights Tribunals

Chapter © 2021

References

• Abashidze A (2011) The complementary role of general comments in enhancing the implementation of treaty bodies’ recommendations and views (the example of CESCR). In: Bassiouni CM, Schabas W (eds) New challenges for the human rights treaty machinery. Intersentia, Cambridge, pp 137–148 Google Scholar
• Addo MK (2010) Practice of United Nations human rights treaty bodies in the reconciliation of cultural diversity with universal respect for human rights. Hum Rights Q 32:601–664 ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Aidoo AA et al (2009) The Dublin statement on the process of strengthening of the United Nations human rights treaty body system, at: www2.ohchr.org/English/bodies/HRTD/docs/DublinStatement.pdf. Accessed 30 Aug 2017
• Alston P, Crawford J (eds) (2000) The future of UN human rights treaty monitoring. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Google Scholar
• Bantekas I, Oette L (2016) International human rights law and practice, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Google Scholar
• Bayefsky AF (2001) The UN human rights system: universality at the crossroads. Kluwer Law International, The Hague Google Scholar
• Creamer C, Simmons B (2015) Ratification, reporting, and rights: quality of participation in the convention against torture. Hum Rights Q 37:579–608 ArticleGoogle Scholar
• de Búrca, G (2017) Human rights experimentalism, AJIL 111:277-316 Google Scholar
• de Gaer F (2011) Implementing treaty body recommendations: establishing better follow-up procedures. In: Bassiouni CM, Schabas W (eds) New challenges for the human rights treaty machinery. Intersentia, Cambridge, pp 107–121 Google Scholar
• Della Fina V, Cera R, Palmisano G (eds) (2017) The United Nations convention on the rights of persons with disabilities: a commentary. Springer, Cham Google Scholar
• Edwards A (2011) Universal suffrage and the international human rights treaty bodies: where are the women? In: Bassiouni CM, Schabas W (eds) New challenges for the human rights treaty machinery. Intersentia, Cambridge, pp 151–170 Google Scholar
• Evans MD (2017) Co-existence and confidentiality: the experience of the optional protocol to the convention against torture, harmony and human rights: the music of the spheres. In: Buckley CM, Donald A, Leach P (eds) Towards convergence in international human rights law: approaches of regional and international systems. Brill Nijhoff, Leiden, pp 516–542 Google Scholar
• Heyns C, Viljoen F (2002) The impact of the United Nations human rights treaties on the domestic level. Kluwer Law International, The Hague Google Scholar
• International Court of Justice (2010) Case concerning Ahmadou Sadio Diallo, Republic of Guinea v. Democratic Republic of the Congo, Merits, Judgment, ICJ Reports 2010, p 639 Google Scholar
• International Law Association (2004) Final report on the impact of findings of the United Nations human rights treaty bodies. In International Law Association, Report of the Seventy-First Conference, pp 621–702 Google Scholar
• Johnstone RL (2006) Feminist influences on the United Nations human rights treaty bodies. Hum Rights Q 28:148–185 ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Kälin W (2012) Examination of state reports. In: Keller H, Ulfstein G (eds) UN human rights treaty bodies: law and legitimacy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 16–72 ChapterGoogle Scholar
• Keller H, Grover L (2012) General comments of the human rights committee and their legitimacy. In: Keller H, Ulfstein G (eds) UN human rights treaty bodies: law and legitimacy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 116–198 Google Scholar
• Keller H, Ulfstein G (2012) UN human rights treaty bodies: law and legitimacy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge BookGoogle Scholar
• Kelly T (2009) The UN Committee against torture: human rights monitoring and the legal recognition of cruelty. Hum Rights Q 31:777–800 ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Kelly T (2015) Two cheers for ritual: the UN committee against torture. Paper delivered at ‘The Rituals of Human Rights’ Workshop, Centre for International Governance and Justice, RegNet, Australian University, Canberra, Australia, 25–27 June 2014, available online at www.regnet.anu.edu.au/research/publications/6121/rituals-human-rights-workshop-working-paper-no-7-two-cheers-ritual. Accessed 29 Nov 2017
• Kennedy D (2002) The international human rights movement: part of the problem. Harv Hum Rights J 15:101–126 Google Scholar
• Kletzel G, Barretto Maia C, Zwaig M (2011) Strengthening of the UN treaty bodies’ complaints procedures: elements for a reform agenda from an NGO perspective. In: Bassiouni CM, Schabas W (eds) New challenges for the human rights treaty machinery. Intersentia, Cambridge, pp 193–236 Google Scholar
• Lauterpacht H (1945) An international bill of the rights of man. Oxford University Press, Oxford Google Scholar
• LeBlanc LJ et al (2010) Compliance with the reporting requirements of human rights conventions. Int J Hum Rights 14:789–807 ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Levin A (2016) The reporting cycle to the United Nations human rights treaty bodies: creating a dialogue between the state and civil society- the Israeli case study. George Washington Int Law Rev 48:315–376 Google Scholar
• Lynch P, Schokman B (2011) Taking human rights from the grassroots to Geneva … and back: strengthening the relationship between UN treaty bodies and NGOs. In: Bassiouni CM, Schabas W (eds) New challenges for the human rights treaty machinery. Intersentia, Cambridge, pp 173–192 Google Scholar
• Mechlem K (2009) Treaty bodies and the interpretation of human rights. Vanderbilt J Transl Law 42:905–947 Google Scholar
• Morijn J (2011) Reforming United Nations human rights treaty monitoring system. Neth Int Law Rev LVIII:295–333 ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Mutua M (2001) Savages, victims, and saviors: the metaphor of human rights. Harv Int Law J 42:201–245 Google Scholar
• Mutua M (2016) Human rights standards: hegemony, law and politics. State University of New York Press, New York Google Scholar
• Nowak M, McArthur E (2008) The United Nations convention against torture: a commentary. Oxford University Press, Oxford BookGoogle Scholar
• O’Flaherty M (2006) The concluding observations of United Nations human rights treaty bodies. Hum Rights Law Rev 6:27–52 ArticleGoogle Scholar
• O’Flaherty M (2011) The United Nations human rights treaty bodies as diplomatic actors. In: O’Flaherty M et al (eds) Human rights diplomacy: contemporary perspectives. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden, pp 155–171 ChapterGoogle Scholar
• O’Flaherty M, O’Brien C (2007) Reform of UN human rights treaty monitoring bodies: a critique of the concept paper on the high Commissioner’s proposal for a unified standing treaty body. Hum Rights Law Rev 7:147–172 Google Scholar
• O’Flaherty M, Tsai P-L (2011) Periodic reporting: the backbone of the UN treaty body review procedures. In: Bassiouni CM, Schabas W (eds) New challenges for the human rights treaty machinery. Intersentia, Cambridge, pp 37–56 Google Scholar
• Oberleitner G (2007) Global human rights institutions: between remedy and ritual. Polity, Cambridge Google Scholar
• Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (2006) Concept Paper on the High Commissioner’s Proposal for a Unified Standing Treaty Body. UN Doc. HRI/MC/2006/2 Google Scholar
• Pillay N (2012) Strengthening the United Nations Human Rights Treaty Bodies: A report by the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, at: www2.ohchr.org/English/bodies/HRTD/docs/HCreportTBStrengthening.pdf. Accessed 29 Aug 2017
• Rajagopal B (2003) International law from below: development, social movements, and third world resistance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge BookGoogle Scholar
• Rodley N (2009) The United Nations human rights council, its special procedure, and its relationship with the treaty bodies: complementarity or competition? In: Boyle K (ed) New institutions for human rights protection. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 49–73 ChapterGoogle Scholar
• Rodley N (2012) UN treaty bodies and the human rights council. In: Keller H, Ulfstein G (eds) UN human rights treaty bodies: law and legitimacy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 320–355 ChapterGoogle Scholar
• Schlütter B (2012) Aspects of human rights interpretation by the UN treaty bodies. In: Keller H, Ulfstein G (eds) UN human rights treaty bodies: law and legitimacy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 261–319 ChapterGoogle Scholar
• Thornberry P (2016) The international convention on the elimination of all forms of racial discrimination: a commentary. Oxford University Press, Oxford Google Scholar
• Ulfstein G (2012) Individual complaints. In: Keller H, Ulfstein G (eds) UN human rights treaty bodies: law and legitimacy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 73–115 Google Scholar
• United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner (2015) Handbook for human rights treaty body members. United Nations, New York Google Scholar
• United Nations Secretary-General (2016) Status of the human rights treaty body system. UN Doc. A/71/118 Google Scholar
• Van Alebeek R, Nollkaemper A (2012) The legal status of decisions by human rights treaty bodies in national law. In: Keller H, Ulfstein G (eds) UN human rights treaty bodies: law and legitimacy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 356–413 Google Scholar

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

1. SOAS, University of London, London, UK Lutz Oette

1. Lutz Oette